Skip to content

Andy Unedited

  • About Andy
  • Write Better

Andy Unedited

Exploring Books, Life, and Writing

Please Don’t Use the Dictionary!

September 29, 2010 by Andy Le Peau

It’s one of the most common and one of the dullest tools that writers or speakers pull out of their toolboxes–quoting a dictionary definition when trying to make a point. It happens every day whether it’s a blogger, a teacher, a preacher or a speaker. Webster gets quoted to define some painfully ordinary word like professional or accidental or addiction. Why is this such a problem?

It’s lazy. Instead of writers making a true effort to help their readers understand the content in their own words in a way that clearly communicates to them in their context, they do the easiest thing in the world–look up a word in a dictionary.

It tells but doesn’t show. Skilled communicators know that if you want to express your ideas powerfully, telling is rarely sufficient. Showing with a story or an illustration or a metaphor captures emotion and imagination. A dry, dictionary definition is deadly.

It seems authoritative but it’s not. Somehow people think Webster is a kind of oracle. Certainly there is a lot of excellent scholarship that goes into the making of dictionaries. But if you want a real expert to support what you have to say about a particular subject, you probably shouldn’t quote a lexicographer.

It insults your audience. Do you really think your readers or listeners don’t know what professional, accidental or addiction means?

Sometimes the U.S. Senator from Illinois, [Dick Durbin](http://durbin.senate.gov/), needs to be identified. Sometimes specialized vocabulary needs to be defined. So when you talk about supralapsarianism, please explain. But to define professional is not professional.

Post navigation

Previous Post:

It’s the Smell I Remember

Next Post:

The Man’s Man of Letters

5 Commments

  1. Mark Denning says:
    September 29, 2010 at 9:59 am

    I understand what you are getting at by discouraging folks form robotic quoting like “Webster Says…” or “Webster defines…”. I find myself thinking somewhat opposite not about people quoting from dictionaries but about wishing they would used one so they could be more precise and therefore more clear. I would re- title your post: Pleas Use the Dictionary! Just Don’t Quote from It Every Time You speak.

    I hear the word professional tossed about all the time to the point that I have gone to a dictionary to make sure I do understand what it means. I AlWAYS hear it used in the adjectival sense to mean: “exhibiting a courteous, conscientious, and generally businesslike manner in the workplace”. That is how I hear it used 99 percent of the time. People mean dress appropriately or be timely or be courteous or treat your clients/coworkers with respect but they say, “be professional”.

    I was at a funeral for a solder last week who was described as a “silent professional”. In my mind that is Special Forces speak for someone who is good at applying lethal force with precision. I have no idea if that is what it really means. Another example for that word’s confusing usage is the title of John Piper’s book, Brothers We Are Not Professionals. I have not read this book so I don’t know what he means but it does not line up with the common usage of the word in my mind. Is he telling ministers not to dress formally or not to be timely or not to be courteous or not to treat their parishioners with respect? I doubt it.

    I NEVER hear the word professional used in the original sense of belonging to a profession; i.e. the medical profession.

    So I honestly do question if people understand what I mean when I am trying to convey an idea with words. Do they understand professional the same way I do? Who knows anymore!

  2. Mark Denning says:
    September 30, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    This is a completely unrelated topic; do the staff at IVP go on Wayzgoose? I saw this and thought of you folks.

    http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/daily-lexeme-wayzgoose/

  3. Andy Le Peau says:
    September 30, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    Mark, No we don’t go on Wayzgoose, but maybe we should!

    Andy

  4. Rachel Shields says:
    October 21, 2010 at 9:00 am

    The other cliched opener that gets me is, “If you do an internet search for ___…”

    But even as I’m rolling my eyes ever so slightly, I’m leaning forward to hear what the google generation thinks about the topic on hand.

    Webster defines “duplicity” as …

  5. Andy Le Peau says:
    October 21, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    Absolutely, Rachel. The Google results thing is so lame. Of course you are going to get a bazillion hits on Google. It means almost nothing. It looks like research, but it’s not.

Comments are closed.

My Books

Categories

Subscribe to Andy Unedited

Loading

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Smaller Is Bigger
  • Design Makes a Difference
  • The Singular Plural
  • The Four Phases of Editing
  • The Fruit-Tree Structure

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
© 2021 Andy Unedited | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes